On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 11:58, Wade Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not semantic versioning? Asking as it takes care of different meta info > such as what we are discussing, and it is quickly becoming an OSS defacto > standard from what I can tell anecdotally.
Yes, I'm very pro semantic versioning! My thoughts come from a remark made by Bertrand - "Each VOTE thread must be about one specific set of artifacts, clearly identified.". What we're voting on is 9.0, and any version info built into that release should obviously say 9.0. Whether *that* 9.0 sees the light of day is another matter, but it's an internal thing. So, while we could use a suffix, and Bertrand suggested -vc1, I'd be equally happy with a tag like "9.0 (vote 1)". And a second tag of the same commit as "9.0" assuming it passes. My 2c. Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
