Great, thanks for taking the initiative, Neil and Antonio.

Gj

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Antonio <[email protected]> wrote:

> So shall we remove the bits.netbeans.org subdirectory at [1]?
>
> Neil suggests "incubator-netbeans-website-docs" as a repository for
> holding the javadoc files. I'm not sure we want to host these files in a
> git repository, though. What does infra have to say? Maybe we could set up
> a simple web directory somewhere? I'll find out.
>
> Cheers,
> Antonio
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-website/tree/
> master/bits.netbeans.org
>
> El 17/09/2018 a las 15:28, Neil C Smith escribió:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 14:12, Geertjan Wielenga
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, what do you mean by 'a release version of the JavaDoc'? I.e., you
>>> could get the sources of the 9.0 release and produce the javadoc from
>>> there
>>> and you'd have the release version of the javadoc, wouldn't you?
>>>
>>>
>> It says it's the development version of the docs when you open it,
>> rather than NetBeans 9.0.  I was assuming that there was something
>> different in the build invocation to get a release version.  But
>> having found this file -
>> https://github.com/emilianbold/netbeans-releases/blob/
>> master/nbbuild/javadoctools/export2html.xsl
>> and the old history, maybe that's what needs editing / updating?
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to