I see a lot of items still open in the 'enterprise' cluster when I look at
the Rat report:

https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-linux/826/artifact/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt

Gj

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Josh Juneau <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've been trying to get through the licensing for the Java EE-related
> modules.  Some of them are tough...no doubt.  I've found some modules that
> have dozens of files that need to be licensed (mostly test souces...but not
> in Rat), and others include a few external dependencies that require
> special attention.  I'll try to focus on getting through these licensing
> issues over the next week.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:51 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Right now, it seems we're comfortable with JDK 11 and PHP, though we'd be
> > very happy for Jakarta EE, Groovy, and JavaScript to be included --
> > assuming people step up for real beyond sending e-mails about this. I.e.,
> > Junichi has clearly taken the leadership in terms of PHP and we're in a
> > good state here, if the same can be done for other clusters and soon,
> then
> > let's include those too for the November release, otherwise focus on
> those
> > for the next quarter, i.e., February 2019.
> >
> > That said, here's the starting point for the Wiki for Apache NetBeans 10:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+10
> >
> > Please populate the above (e.g., put anything in the Miscellaneous page
> > that's not directly applicable to PHP and JDK 11) with your enhancements,
> > features, and significant bug fixes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gj
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, cool, and sorry for forgetting about that, Emmanuel.
> > >
> > > Could you put together everything you have done in this area?
> > >
> > > Have you put everything you've done as pull requests into the Apache
> > > NetBeans GitHub repo?
> > >
> > > How far off are we from having Java EE 8 support right now, i.e., what
> > > would that entail?
> > >
> > > Sure, if we can take a swing at it and have clear direction and the
> time
> > > to do it for the November release, let's do it.
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM, ehsavoie <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >> I'm almost sure that i wrote some changes since 8.2 and I have more
> for
> > >> WildFly that have been resting in my local repo for a year.
> > >> Also we don't have support for javaEE8 so no Jakarta EE :(
> > >> We really should take a swing at this because this is coming back to
> me
> > a
> > >> lot this lack of 'native' support for JavaEE in NetBeans
> > >> ----------
> > >> Emmanuel Hugonnet
> > >> http://www.ehsavoie.com
> > >> http://twitter.com/ehsavoie
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:11 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> > Some (e.g., Josh) have argued we should include the enterprise
> cluster
> > >> in
> > >> > the upcoming release to support Jakarta EE.
> > >> >
> > >> > One point to realize here is that no development has been done in
> this
> > >> area
> > >> > and the functionality in GitHub right now is identical to that
> > provided
> > >> by
> > >> > 8.2 plugins.
> > >> >
> > >> > However, the challenges we’re going to run into probably with
> > >> > licensing-related issues, plus the simple fact that the enterprise
> > >> cluster
> > >> > is large and will add time in reviewing the release, might argue
> > against
> > >> > including it, and instead support Jakarta EE by including the 8.2
> > update
> > >> > center registration in the release to simplify finding and
> installing
> > >> the
> > >> > related plugins.
> > >> >
> > >> > Plus maybe we could rename the too general name ‘enterprise’ with
> > >> ‘jakarta’
> > >> > or ‘jakartaee’ as the name of the cluster, to make it clearer what
> it
> > >> > contains, and to explicitly support Jakarta EE.
> > >> >
> > >> > Gj
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Josh Juneau
> [email protected]
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>

Reply via email to