Hi Geertjan,

Yes, I've not made it through the licensing for the Java EE modules as
quickly as I had hoped to.  There are a couple of particularly messy
modules that I've been working with...but I will try to get through more
this week.

Thanks for following up...I appreciate it!

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:41 AM Geertjan Wielenga
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I see a lot of items still open in the 'enterprise' cluster when I look at
> the Rat report:
>
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-linux/826/artifact/nbbuild/build/rat-report.txt
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Josh Juneau <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been trying to get through the licensing for the Java EE-related
> > modules.  Some of them are tough...no doubt.  I've found some modules
> that
> > have dozens of files that need to be licensed (mostly test souces...but
> not
> > in Rat), and others include a few external dependencies that require
> > special attention.  I'll try to focus on getting through these licensing
> > issues over the next week.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:51 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Right now, it seems we're comfortable with JDK 11 and PHP, though we'd
> be
> > > very happy for Jakarta EE, Groovy, and JavaScript to be included --
> > > assuming people step up for real beyond sending e-mails about this.
> I.e.,
> > > Junichi has clearly taken the leadership in terms of PHP and we're in a
> > > good state here, if the same can be done for other clusters and soon,
> > then
> > > let's include those too for the November release, otherwise focus on
> > those
> > > for the next quarter, i.e., February 2019.
> > >
> > > That said, here's the starting point for the Wiki for Apache NetBeans
> 10:
> > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+10
> > >
> > > Please populate the above (e.g., put anything in the Miscellaneous page
> > > that's not directly applicable to PHP and JDK 11) with your
> enhancements,
> > > features, and significant bug fixes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, cool, and sorry for forgetting about that, Emmanuel.
> > > >
> > > > Could you put together everything you have done in this area?
> > > >
> > > > Have you put everything you've done as pull requests into the Apache
> > > > NetBeans GitHub repo?
> > > >
> > > > How far off are we from having Java EE 8 support right now, i.e.,
> what
> > > > would that entail?
> > > >
> > > > Sure, if we can take a swing at it and have clear direction and the
> > time
> > > > to do it for the November release, let's do it.
> > > >
> > > > Gj
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM, ehsavoie <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >> I'm almost sure that i wrote some changes since 8.2 and I have more
> > for
> > > >> WildFly that have been resting in my local repo for a year.
> > > >> Also we don't have support for javaEE8 so no Jakarta EE :(
> > > >> We really should take a swing at this because this is coming back to
> > me
> > > a
> > > >> lot this lack of 'native' support for JavaEE in NetBeans
> > > >> ----------
> > > >> Emmanuel Hugonnet
> > > >> http://www.ehsavoie.com
> > > >> http://twitter.com/ehsavoie
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:11 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi all,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Some (e.g., Josh) have argued we should include the enterprise
> > cluster
> > > >> in
> > > >> > the upcoming release to support Jakarta EE.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > One point to realize here is that no development has been done in
> > this
> > > >> area
> > > >> > and the functionality in GitHub right now is identical to that
> > > provided
> > > >> by
> > > >> > 8.2 plugins.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > However, the challenges we’re going to run into probably with
> > > >> > licensing-related issues, plus the simple fact that the enterprise
> > > >> cluster
> > > >> > is large and will add time in reviewing the release, might argue
> > > against
> > > >> > including it, and instead support Jakarta EE by including the 8.2
> > > update
> > > >> > center registration in the release to simplify finding and
> > installing
> > > >> the
> > > >> > related plugins.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Plus maybe we could rename the too general name ‘enterprise’ with
> > > >> ‘jakarta’
> > > >> > or ‘jakartaee’ as the name of the cluster, to make it clearer what
> > it
> > > >> > contains, and to explicitly support Jakarta EE.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Gj
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > Josh Juneau
> > [email protected]
> > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> >
>
-- 
Josh Juneau
[email protected]
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866

Reply via email to