Hi,
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 17:48, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Java Application:
> - Maven based
> - ANT based
>
> This doesn't really move ANT out of sight, and is only slightly better
> than what we have now. It also adds one more click to the wizard.
That's not quite what I envisaged by using the hierarchy for this though -
thinking more about
Java
- Java Application (Maven)
- POM Project
- Project with Existing POM
- Ant based
- Java Application (Ant)
- Java Free-Form Project
NetBeans
- NetBeans Application (Maven)
- NetBeans Module (Maven)
- Ant based
- NetBeans Application (Ant)
- NetBeans Module (Ant)
Java Web
- ...
Something like that anyway. ie. only the non-default / legacy stuff is in a
sub-category.
Agree with Emi that there's no rush for a PR on the basis that we're
talking NB11 earliest, but less sure how the wizard combobox option would
actually be preferable to revising project selection in practice. Depends
how much each type of project overlaps across build systems I guess?
Best wishes,
Neil
