On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:12 PM Scott Palmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe that was a bad example. To be honest, I don’t really know. The > more I try to migrate from JDK 8 to JDK 11 the more baffled I am. I know > there were some modules in JDK9 and 10 that were some weird SE/EE thing > like JAXB for example, and for those you had to use --add-modules or they > weren’t visible to the unnamed module. > > With JDK 11 I started getting compile errors that the java.util.logging > package wasn’t known until I started invoking java with > --add-modules=java.logging. I may have been struggling with other module > issues at the time that could have caused that. > > But either way, auto-complete in NetBeans can’t “see” the > java.util.logging package. “logging” is not offered as a suggestion for > auto-complete. With a Gradle project (using the netbeans gradle Well, in a plain ant (J2SE) project, I can see "logging" in the code completion after "java.util.". But it is possible the index in your cache directory is broken, which would lead to what you seen. Or something else. Sadly, the e-mails do not contain enough information to diagnose and/or fix that. > plugin 2.0.2 http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/44510/gradle-support < > http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/44510/gradle-support>) it will even > highlight the import line as an error. > It would be perfect if the author of the plugin could take a look. Jan > > Something seems wrong to me. > > Just make a new Java Application project - with no module-info.java, and > start typing: > > import java.util. > > and see what you get for auto-complete. > > Scott > > > On Jan 7, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, I am a bit puzzled: I assumed we are talking about a project that > is > > in the unnamed Jigsaw module, right? Then that should see java.logging > even > > without any --add-modules? > > > > Jan > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:02 PM Scott Palmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> What about the auto-complete not working in the Ant-Based project? > >> How do you tell an Ant-based project which optional modules to include? > >> > >> Scott > >> > >> > >>> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I can make the changes to my Gradle build script to have these options > >>>> set, but NetBeans remains ignorant of the added modules > >>>> > >>> > >>> NetBeans does not support Gradle at this point. > >>> > >>> Gj > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:32 PM Scott Palmer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> I’m copying both the users and dev lists because 1) I tried a similar > >>>> question on the users list where I think this belongs and got no > >> response, > >>>> 2) something is wrong and there should be a discussion with devs. > >>>> > >>>> Netbeans does not seem to have any place to add modules for > non-modular > >>>> applications. > >>>> > >>>> (I assert that most significantly complex applications cannot be > >>>> modularized at this point because sooner or later the dependency chain > >> will > >>>> hit a non-modularized library.) > >>>> > >>>> For example the java.logging module is part of the JDK but needs to be > >>>> added as a dependency using "--add-module java.logging”. > >>>> > >>>> I can make the changes to my Gradle build script to have these options > >>>> set, but NetBeans remains ignorant of the added modules and thus > >> highlights > >>>> the code as if it contains errors. Everything builds fine though. I > >> can’t > >>>> find any place in NetBeans to add this information. I even tried > >> editing > >>>> the etc/netbeans.conf file to add a -J--add-modules=ALL-SYSTEM to the > >>>> default options, but that didn’t seem to have any effect on whatever > >> code > >>>> is determining where all those red squiggles go. > >>>> > >>>> Thinking maybe this was just a Gradle integration issue, I tried an > >>>> Ant-based project (which is not an option for my real work). There I > >>>> noticed different behaviour. I was able to import java.util.logging.* > >>>> without it showing as an error, but curiously the auto-complete would > >> not > >>>> suggest that there was such a package called ‘logging’ after typing > >>>> java.util. Though once I typed it manually, suggestions for classes > in > >> the > >>>> java.util.logging package were made. > >>>> > >>>> It seems there are still a lot of rough edges regarding the module > >> system. > >>>> I didn’t find anything in JIRA, but I can’t imagine that this isn’t a > >> known > >>>> issue. What am I missing? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Scott > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
