Sure, but as you can see, we have different opinions about that. I mean if it 
is that simple, we can now start a vote for the suggestions?


Cheers

Chris



Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Januar 2019 09:30
An: dev
Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 11 or 11.0 ?

I think whatever is super simple and clear is what we should do and
therefore I really like Emilian's suggestion.

We spend more time and energy discussing release numbering than anything
else and the sooner that can stop the better. :-)

Gj

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:28 AM Christian Lenz <christian.l...@gmx.net>
wrote:

> And for the codenames, I mean 2019.03 could have also a moon chemical
> thing like Natrium or whatever. For me it is more to say and, instead of or.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Von: Kenneth Fogel
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2019 20:44
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: Apache NetBeans 11 or 11.0 ?
>
> We could use seemingly random words like Eclipse does so that no one knows
> what the most recent version is. For example, we could use the names of the
> 63 moons of Jupiter, the planet with the most moons. Also, select them
> randomly, users will catch on if we do it alphabetically. Here are the 51
> named moons:
>
> Adrastea        Erinome Isonoe          Sponde
> Aitne           Euanthe Kale            Taygete
> Amalthea        Eukelade        Kallichore      Thebe
> Ananke          Euporie         Kalyke          Thelxinoe
> Aoede           Europa          Kore            Themisto
> Arche           Eurydome        Leda            Thyone
> Autonoe Ganymede        Lysithea
> Callirrhoe      Harpalyke       Megaclite
> Callisto                Hegemone        Metis
> Carme           Helike          Mneme
> Carpo           Hermippe        Orthosie
> Chaldene        Herse           Pasiphae
> Cyllene         Himalia         Pasithee
> Dia             Io              Praxidike
> Elara           Iocaste         Sinope
>
> There are about 12 more moons with numeric names awaiting formal names.
>
> Ken
>
>
>

Reply via email to