Glad to hear ExecuteScript is helping you. It is becoming very heavily used as a “glue” processor to adapt edge cases, and (without speaking for Matt), I would consider it no longer “experimental” when used with certain scripting languages (Groovy, primarily). It still has some rough edges with other languages. There is actually a PR open right now [1] to add pooled execution to allow multithreading as well. This should greatly improve performance.
We would definitely appreciate you sharing the template for our template gallery [2]. You can export the flow as a template, then upload the XML file, and add a short description on the wiki. Just to be clear, were you asking for advice on that process, or on the code to do the regex processing in the ExecuteScript processor? [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/443 <https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/443> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Example+Dataflow+Templates <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Example+Dataflow+Templates> Andy LoPresto [email protected] [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 > On May 17, 2016, at 7:41 AM, idioma <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andy, all, > thank you so much for your help. I have already started using ExecuteScript > quite heavily, in particular for data cleaning and wrangling between > processors. I was only concern that being experimental, it was not > particularly recommended to use in complex dataflow like the one I am > working on. I will be happy to share the final version of the dataflow as a > template. Can you advise how you would do it? > > Thank you again, > > I. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-nifi-developer-list.39713.n7.nabble.com/Help-with-ReplaceTextWithMapping-processor-multi-column-mappings-tp10280p10410.html > Sent from the Apache NiFi Developer List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
