Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/21#discussion_r69178841
--- Diff:
minifi-commons/minifi-commons-schema/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/commons/schema/BaseSchema.java
---
@@ -15,13 +15,17 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
-package org.apache.nifi.minifi.bootstrap.util.schema.common;
+package org.apache.nifi.minifi.commons.schema;
import java.lang.reflect.Constructor;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class BaseSchema {
--- End diff --
Right the "Validation Issue helper methods" access the validation issues,
which is something every schema will have, so it's good to keep them
implemented how they are.
The "Value Access/Interpretation helper methods" are all methods that do
not necessarily rely on the internal representation of each schema but instead
are helper methods for accessing/interpreting values. So they can be static.
For toMap I agree that it's good to encourage the use of LinkedHashMap.
Maybe a protected method getMap for the schemas to use. Then toMap would be
abstract.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
