Hi again, This was indeed silly. When asking I was assuming that Processes were available remotely, not "just" the IN/OUT ports.
I can see how the port-only strategy is a good thing. All the best, -Stefán On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Stefán Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This may be a silly question, please forgive me. > > We are trying integrating our platform with Nifi in an as efficient way as > possible and we have been implementing the same "port based" integrations > as used for stream processing solutions. > > The nifi-site-to-site-client library makes this very easy but the IN or > OUT port approach seems slightly "disjoint", at least in comparison with > remote process groups which support both IN and OUT > > And here is the question. Is there a library available which would allow a > solution to provide a Nifi compatable "Remote Process Group" service > without being a complete Nifi server? > > All the best, > -Stefán >
