+1 non-binding. I like the separation and I see a lot of need for this in the community.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Matt Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 binding > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > > > Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the > > establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to > > call a formal vote to record this important community decision and > > establish consensus. > > > > The scope of this project is to define APIs for interacting with > > resources that one or more NiFi instances may be interested in, such > > as a flow registry for versioned flows, an extension registry for > > extensions, and possibly other configuration resources in the future. > > In addition, this project will provide reference implementations of > > these registries, with the goal of allowing the community to build a > > diverse set of implementations, such as a Git provider for versioned > > flows, or a bintray provider for an extension registry. > > > > I am a +1 and looking forward to the future work in this area. > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours and be a majority rule vote. > > > > [ ] +1 Establish Registry, a subproject of Apache NiFi > > [ ] 0 Do not care > > [ ] -1 Do not establish Registry, a subproject of Apache NiFi > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bryan > > > > [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nifi-dev/201702. > mbox/%3CCALo_M19euo2LLy0PVWmE70FzeLhQRcCtX6TC%3DqoiBVfn4zFQMA%40mail. > gmail.com%3E >
