I 100% agree with Mike and was actually in the process of writing a very similar response. Just having "Registry" as the name will mean the trademark will be "Apache Registry" and I don't think that conveys the specificity of the sub-project. I'd much prefer something like NiFi Registry like the initial discussion had.
Joe On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Michael Moser <[email protected]> wrote: > I am in favor of the concept but the name made me pause. I did a Google > search of "apache registry" and found an existing Perl module called > Apache::Registry. Should I be worried about potential naming confusion? > > -- Mike > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Oleg Zhurakousky < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 Here as well. We desperately need it. > > > > > On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 non-binding. I like the separation and I see a lot of need for this > in > > > the community. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Matt Burgess <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 binding > > >> > > >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>> All, > > >>> > > >>> Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the > > >>> establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like > to > > >>> call a formal vote to record this important community decision and > > >>> establish consensus. > > >>> > > >>> The scope of this project is to define APIs for interacting with > > >>> resources that one or more NiFi instances may be interested in, such > > >>> as a flow registry for versioned flows, an extension registry for > > >>> extensions, and possibly other configuration resources in the future. > > >>> In addition, this project will provide reference implementations of > > >>> these registries, with the goal of allowing the community to build a > > >>> diverse set of implementations, such as a Git provider for versioned > > >>> flows, or a bintray provider for an extension registry. > > >>> > > >>> I am a +1 and looking forward to the future work in this area. > > >>> > > >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours and be a majority rule vote. > > >>> > > >>> [ ] +1 Establish Registry, a subproject of Apache NiFi > > >>> [ ] 0 Do not care > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not establish Registry, a subproject of Apache NiFi > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> > > >>> Bryan > > >>> > > >>> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nifi-dev/201702. > > >> mbox/%3CCALo_M19euo2LLy0PVWmE70FzeLhQRcCtX6TC%3DqoiBVfn4zFQMA%40mail. > > >> gmail.com%3E > > >> > > > > > -- *Joe Percivall* linkedin.com/in/Percivall e: [email protected]
