Thanks Bryan.

If ‘-s’ is only for showcasing the committer I don’t believe anyone would have 
any issues with it, but my concern at the moment is purely legal, so I am not 
sure who is the right person to answer that, but figured raising the concern is 
the least I can do.

Cheers
Oleg


> On Mar 2, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The sign-off is so we can easily see who the reviewer/merger was from
> the git history.
> 
> We can always go back to the JIRA or PR and the reviewer/merger should
> have commented there, but its convenient to see it in the git history
> in my opinion.
> 
> Personally, whenever merging someones contribution I use "git am
> --signoff < patchfile" which I guess is equivalent to doing the ammend
> after applying the patch.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Oleg Zhurakousky
> <ozhurakou...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Andre
>> 
>> Thanks for the reminder. I admit that I did not know that we require it in 
>> the Contributor Guide, so thanks for pointing it out.
>> However, your email did prompt me to look at the purpose and origin of the 
>> ‘-s’ flag and led me to this thread on Stack Overflow - 
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1962094/what-is-the-sign-off-feature-in-git-for.
>> 
>> And I am now wondering if we should require it or even use it in the first 
>> place, since it’s origin, history and purpose appears to have more 
>> “individual” legal implications then showcasing the actual committer.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Oleg
>> 
>> On Mar 2, 2017, at 6:35 AM, Andre 
>> <andre-li...@fucs.org<mailto:andre-li...@fucs.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> dev,
>> 
>> May I remind you to ensure we follow the Contributor Guide and use:
>> 
>> git commit --amend -s
>> 
>> when merging commits from your peers?
>> 
>> While git pretty-format can be used to reveal the committer, I am sure that
>> all of us will agree that as an inclusive community we value both the
>> pretty and ugly formats...
>> 
>> So can we give the ugly format the support it deserves and ensure we add
>> the neat Signed-off-by stamp to the commit message?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
> 

Reply via email to