Mark, The docs are community developed. The community would be very accepting of improvements and fixes. That being said, there is more documentation on how to contribute code than there is documentation, and it can depend if it is in confluence, the processors, or on the web page. Do you have more specifics?
Tony On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Mark Bean <mark.o.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been asking many questions lately regarding NiFi 1.x because we are > in the process of more deliberately evaluating 1.x as it relates to our > current production level flows. In the process, I have found the > documentation to be incomplete, sometimes incorrect (e.g. typo), contain > references to 0.x-specific items and generally lacking information (e.g. > "In the future, we hope to provide supplemental documentation that covers > the NiFi Cluster Architecture in depth.") IMO, the guides are not always > sufficient to a novice user, but require pre-existing knowledge or > experience to read between the lines. > > In general, I think the provided documentation (starting with the Admin and > User Guides) could use a thorough review and update. Is this something that > is on anyone's the "hit list"? If someone picks this up, I could provide > feedback in a more directed way rather than spamming the mailing list. > > Thanks, > Mark >
