have you tried rebuilding all of nifi? and is this on master? On Sun, Sep 23, 2018, 11:29 AM Ed B <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had to build nifi-standard-processors project, and the build was OK all > the way until tests. Tests where failing with NoSuchMethodError for some of > the Jetty classes. > I found out that Jetty version has been changed to newer one: > [image: image.png] > > If I change it back to 9.4.3 - build runs successfully including tests. > > Exception I'm getting with 9.4.11: > [INFO] Running org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpTwoWaySSL > [ERROR] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.006 s <<< FAILURE! - in > org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpTwoWaySSL > [ERROR] org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpTwoWaySSL Time > elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR! > java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.<init>(Z)V > at > org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpTwoWaySSL.beforeClass(TestInvokeHttpTwoWaySSL.java:42) > > [ERROR] org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpTwoWaySSL Time > elapsed: 0.006 s <<< ERROR! > java.lang.NullPointerException > > [INFO] Running org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpSSL > [ERROR] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.001 s <<< FAILURE! - in > org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpSSL > [ERROR] org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpSSL Time > elapsed: 0.001 s <<< ERROR! > java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.<init>(Z)V > at > org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpSSL.createServer(TestInvokeHttpSSL.java:93) > at > org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpSSL.beforeClass(TestInvokeHttpSSL.java:55) > > [ERROR] org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpSSL Time > elapsed: 0.001 s <<< ERROR! > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.TestInvokeHttpSSL.afterClass(TestInvokeHttpSSL.java:66) > > and others... > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > Ed. >
