Other communities are using a workflow in which a JIRA linked to a PR is good enough (e.g. Lucene), and there's an integration where a commit comment with a PR # closes the PR.
So if you want that stuff, we should ask infra@ about it. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]> wrote: > No, an ICLA is not necessary for contributions submitted through ASF > infrastructure. See the definition of Contribution and the section on > Submission of Contributions in the Apache License v. 2.0 ( > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0). > > If we want to be able to accept GitHub pull requests, the process is not as > clear. The first couple of paragraphs under "Reviewing contributor > changes" on http://accumulo.apache.org/git.html are worth reading. Also > we > would need to make sure pull requests trigger an email to the dev list -- > not sure if that is set up by default, or if we have to request it. > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Mentors, > > > > For NIFI-154 we received a patch via Jira. I read that this is > inherently > > considered a submission that is useable but that was on the webpage of > > another apache project. Is this correct? Do we need to request ICLAs > > before we can use these things? > > > > Just want to make sure the process of accepting patches is understood. > > > > Thanks > > Joe > > >
