That would have to be the IPMC chair. This is a bit of a surprise to me, ask on general@incu?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > Benson, Mentors, > > We received a reply from INFRA that the way to get this setup is to > request from the PMC Chair (i assume that is you?) > > " > hi > > pleae get pmc chair to fiil out:- > > https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq > > Thanks! > https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq > " > > Can you please do this? > > Thanks > Joe > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is the INFRA ticket for this: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9462 > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Aldrin, > >> > >> I agree and a few others have brought it up as well. There haven't > >> been any objections that I am aware of so will send in the INFRA > >> ticket shortly. > >> > >> Also for everyone's awareness i started a meetup for folks in the DC, > >> MD, VA area. Our first event is here: > >> > http://www.meetup.com/Apache-NiFi-Users-Group-DC-VA-MD/events/221910531/ > >> > >> We hope to see folks there. We've had two companies offer their space > >> on a recurring basis both of which are in the Columbia, MD area. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Joe > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Presentations provided by both Joe Witt and Joey Echeverria sparked > >>> interest in NiFi. To that end, a lot of the dialog occurring was less > >>> specifically development focused and more on how to use NiFi, > explaining > >>> scope of the project, and how to integrate with existing data flow, > >>> inclusive of suggestions on ideas for data formats and > sources/destinations > >>> for data. > >>> > >>> For the sake of separation, does it make sense to now introduce a users > >>> list in conjunction with the dev list to facilitate the separation of > >>> channels of information? Not sure what kind of lead time is needed for > >>> infra (assuming this is in fact done through them), so even if this is > a > >>> bit on the early side, it may coincide with a juncture when a > legitimate > >>> need is there. >
