Benson, I sent the request to general@iao.
Got sent back here. Thanks Joe On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > ok will do. > > thanks > Joe > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Benson Margulies > <[email protected]> wrote: >> That would have to be the IPMC chair. This is a bit of a surprise to me, >> ask on general@incu? >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Benson, Mentors, >>> >>> We received a reply from INFRA that the way to get this setup is to >>> request from the PMC Chair (i assume that is you?) >>> >>> " >>> hi >>> >>> pleae get pmc chair to fiil out:- >>> >>> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq >>> >>> Thanks! >>> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq >>> " >>> >>> Can you please do this? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Joe >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Here is the INFRA ticket for this: >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9462 >>> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> Aldrin, >>> >> >>> >> I agree and a few others have brought it up as well. There haven't >>> >> been any objections that I am aware of so will send in the INFRA >>> >> ticket shortly. >>> >> >>> >> Also for everyone's awareness i started a meetup for folks in the DC, >>> >> MD, VA area. Our first event is here: >>> >> >>> http://www.meetup.com/Apache-NiFi-Users-Group-DC-VA-MD/events/221910531/ >>> >> >>> >> We hope to see folks there. We've had two companies offer their space >>> >> on a recurring basis both of which are in the Columbia, MD area. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks >>> >> Joe >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Presentations provided by both Joe Witt and Joey Echeverria sparked >>> >>> interest in NiFi. To that end, a lot of the dialog occurring was less >>> >>> specifically development focused and more on how to use NiFi, >>> explaining >>> >>> scope of the project, and how to integrate with existing data flow, >>> >>> inclusive of suggestions on ideas for data formats and >>> sources/destinations >>> >>> for data. >>> >>> >>> >>> For the sake of separation, does it make sense to now introduce a users >>> >>> list in conjunction with the dev list to facilitate the separation of >>> >>> channels of information? Not sure what kind of lead time is needed for >>> >>> infra (assuming this is in fact done through them), so even if this is >>> a >>> >>> bit on the early side, it may coincide with a juncture when a >>> legitimate >>> >>> need is there. >>>
