+1 Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 27, 2020, at 12:50 PM, Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > Lazy consensus is the most "proper" way for it and no need for a non-lazy > consensus voting [1]. Lazy consensus is simply an announcement of 'silence > gives assent' [2]. What this means is that one make a proposal and state > that he/she will start implementing it in 72 hours unless someone objects. > 72 hours is chosen because it accounts for different timezones and > non-apache commitments. > > Here is an example: [3]. On the other hand, there is another example of > being a volunteer but not starting a lazy consensus voting: [4]. > > All in all, the more "Apache Way" is to start a Discuss thread about > cutting a new release and proposing yourself as a release manager for. > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#release_manager > [2] > https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html#stating-lazy-consensus > [3] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8a8c12bc5d6f89a3e67454277b22875289be8de4799c03e01d2e5b8b%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > [4] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r024754c61d9f663f71b7db52bc9b815c9853e7cc486a8185d670f478%40%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3E > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:02 PM Aaron Radzinski <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Mentors - do we need to have a vote on selecting the Release Manager? We >> are getting close to to be ready for our first release under ASF... I would >> like to volunteer for this role. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Aaron Radzinski >>
