+1. Furkan's answer is comprehensive. Dave Fisher <[email protected]> 於 2020年3月28日 週六 上午4:47寫道：
> +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 27, 2020, at 12:50 PM, Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > Lazy consensus is the most "proper" way for it and no need for a non-lazy > > consensus voting [1]. Lazy consensus is simply an announcement of > 'silence > > gives assent' [2]. What this means is that one make a proposal and state > > that he/she will start implementing it in 72 hours unless someone > objects. > > 72 hours is chosen because it accounts for different timezones and > > non-apache commitments. > > > > Here is an example: [3]. On the other hand, there is another example of > > being a volunteer but not starting a lazy consensus voting: [4]. > > > > All in all, the more "Apache Way" is to start a Discuss thread about > > cutting a new release and proposing yourself as a release manager for. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Furkan KAMACI > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#release_manager > > [2] > > > https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html#stating-lazy-consensus > > [3] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8a8c12bc5d6f89a3e67454277b22875289be8de4799c03e01d2e5b8b%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > > [4] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r024754c61d9f663f71b7db52bc9b815c9853e7cc486a8185d670f478%40%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3E > > > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:02 PM Aaron Radzinski < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Mentors - do we need to have a vote on selecting the Release Manager? We > >> are getting close to to be ready for our first release under ASF... I > would > >> like to volunteer for this role. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> Aaron Radzinski > >> > >
