+1

We can conclude the vote as is and "wait" for these votes on 'general'
list...
--
Nikita Ivanov



On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:02 PM Aaron Radzinski <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Mentors,
> We are still missing 2 mentor votes. Can you please spare a minute and
> vote on 0.9.0 release? It was put up for a vote over a week ago...
>
> Thank you!
> --
> Aaron Radzinski
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:18 AM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Checked hashes and signatures
> > DISCLAIMER exists (WIP)
> > NOTICE/LICENSE seem okay but I think can be further improved (but WIP
> > covers this)
> > "mvn clean package verify" passes on Ubuntu and Win10
> > "mvn apache-rat:rat" passes
> > incubating in name
> > no unexpected binary files
> > I successfully ran against my previously-created nlpcraft
> > groovy-data-science examples (Groovy client against
> > Groovy/Java/Scala/Kotlin light switch models)
> >
> >
> > Cheers, Paul.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:04 AM Aaron Radzinski <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > NLPCraft-ers,
> > > We are ready for the NLPCraft 0.9.0 release that contains several
> important
> > > big fixes and improvements for the recently released 0.8.0 version.
> One of
> > > the biggest "internal" changes is a migration to Scala 2.13 in
> anticipation
> > > of full migration to Scala 3 later this year.
> > >
> > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating)
> version
> > > 0.9.0.
> > >
> > > Release information:
> > > 1. Release location:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nlpcraft/nlpcraft/0.9.0/
> > > 3. Git tag: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nlpcraft/tree/v0.9.0
> > > 4. JIRA issues fixed in release:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NLPCRAFT/versions/12347778
> > > 5. KEYS file:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/nlpcraft/KEYS
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary
> > > number of votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > --
> > > Aaron Radzinski
> > >
>

Reply via email to