> I'd be happy to roll 1.4 whenever we're ready. > There are quite a few things that we've discussed for 1.4 (e.g. make indexing backend plugable, delegate code to crawler-commons) so it is a bit premature to talk about releasing 1.4 just now. End of 2011 would be a good deadline, with a release roughly every 6 months
Julien > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Jun 30, 2011, at 6:25 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Some issues have been resolved for 1.4. There may be a patch for 2.0 but > these > > remain untested and are not committed so the issues remain open. Should i > > create seperate issues for 2.0 for issues that are not immediately going > to be > > implemented and tested for 2.0? If so, i can set commits for 1.4 to > resolved > > and have a clean list of issues for 1.4. > > > > Thoughts? > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > -- * *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ http://www.digitalpebble.com
