Hi Sebastian,

Once again thanks for this. This is promising. Trunk is now 1.4 current
development [1]. The old trunk (Nutch 2.0) has now been shifted to nutchgora
branch [2]. At first looks nutchgora looks OK (ahem), and I suppose given
time this could be dealt with at a later stage, but if you are able to do
both projects then it would be a great help. We are hoping to get a trunk
1.4 RC rolling as soon as the code formatting is complete.

Thanks
Lewis

[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/trunk/
[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/branches/nutchgora/



On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Sebastian Nagel <[email protected]
> wrote:

> I tried with trunk. 292 files out of 304 java files have been changed.
> I'll have a look into the remaining 12 files.
> Maybe they are just already perfectly formatted.
>
> I could create patches for branch-1.4 and trunk this evening. I guess
> patches are required for both versions?
>
> 2011/10/24 lewis john mcgibbney <[email protected]>:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > Are you working with most recent 1.4 dev?
> >
> > If this is the case, would you be good enough to make the relevant change
> to
> > changes.txt to merit your contribution, add the eclipse-configuration.xml
> to
> > the svn area and attach a patch to the JIRA ticket. As I mentioned, I am
> > unable to do so just now, if you were able to do so it would be
> absolutely
> > great.
> >
> > Thanks for looking in to this. Can anyone confirm how many .java files
> there
> > are in the /src directory? Juts so we know that we've got them all.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Lewis
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Sebastian Nagel
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I can only confirm that with Indigo the command line formatter fails on
> >> source files using generics.
> >>
> >> But when launched from the GUI it works. I imported the
> >> eclipse-codeformat.xml (Properties > Java Code Style > Formatter) and
> run it
> >> on the project node (Source > Format). 292 files have been changed.
> >>
> >> Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lewis
> >
> >
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Reply via email to