Hey Lewis, +1 to just archive it, and then if there are folks that want to use it, then it's there for them to resurrect.
Cheers, Chris On Nov 12, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > Hi, > > Have been thinking conceptually about this over the last week. Managed to > find some interesting conversations on the user archives [1] and had a look > at the Nutch OSGi wiki page which is horribly out of date. Although initially > the OSGi stuff sounds appealing, I can't help but think that why fix what > isn't broken. I think Kirby's points in the correspondence below are really > interesting, and if as a community we agree that OSGi would be better for > Nutch then OK. However in terms of weighing up the pros and cons or trying to > provide a well justified arguement backing OSGi... it would appear that I'm > not fully convinced that anyone has managed to do this yet. > > Does anyone have anything to add? If not then I propose to move the OSGi > documentation to the archive for someone else to bring out on a rainy day a > few years from now. > > Thanks > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02694.html > > -- > Lewis > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
