+1
On 11/13/2011 08:23 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Lewis,
+1 to just archive it, and then if there are folks that want to use it, then
it's there for them to resurrect.
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 12, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi,
Have been thinking conceptually about this over the last week. Managed to find
some interesting conversations on the user archives [1] and had a look at the
Nutch OSGi wiki page which is horribly out of date. Although initially the OSGi
stuff sounds appealing, I can't help but think that why fix what isn't broken.
I think Kirby's points in the correspondence below are really interesting, and
if as a community we agree that OSGi would be better for Nutch then OK. However
in terms of weighing up the pros and cons or trying to provide a well justified
arguement backing OSGi... it would appear that I'm not fully convinced that
anyone has managed to do this yet.
Does anyone have anything to add? If not then I propose to move the OSGi
documentation to the archive for someone else to bring out on a rainy day a few
years from now.
Thanks
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02694.html
--
Lewis
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
