Hi Markus, Thanks for getting back on this one last night. Please see comments inline.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Markus Jelsma <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Tokenization depens whether an analyzer used for the field ... should be > boosted seperately. > Thanks for clarifying all is now crystal. > About the Solr4 schema, it wasn't introduced as a Solr4 compatible version of > the default schema.xml file and i think it should be removed in favour of > updating the schema.xml to Solr4.The only change i can think of is adding the > version field that is mandatory for SolrCloud. The schema version is 1.5 > which the default schema already has. > OK so what about all of the addition config in the schema-solr4.xml file which resides above the actual field definitions? E.g. the tokenisation, etc. parts you discuss above I also think it is too ambiguous (and slightly pointless) to maintain two schema (unless of course someone can provide justification). I think (in all distributions moving forward) we should aim to simplify this and encapsulate all required field and configuration definitions in a single schema.xml... Lewis
