[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16801947#comment-16801947
 ] 

Roannel Fernández Hernández commented on NUTCH-2688:
----------------------------------------------------

I am not satisfied with this solution because it does not ensure that future 
contributions comply with the changes proposed here. So, I was searching and I 
found [this|https://github.com/mycila/license-maven-plugin] and in my opinion 
something similar is what we need to guarantee that future contributions comply 
with what is proposed here. The problem is that it is for Maven and it has not 
been updated for several years. Do you know any similar solution that we can 
use in Nutch?

> Unify the licence headers
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-2688
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2688
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.15
>            Reporter: Roannel Fernández Hernández
>            Assignee: Roannel Fernández Hernández
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 1.16
>
>
> Sometimes the license headers are written in .java classes in a javadoc 
> comment (/** license \*/), sometimes in a block comment (/* license \*/), and 
> sometimes is a javadoc comment but with several * (/**** license */). The 
> idea is to reach an understanding on how the license headers should be 
> written on .java files.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to