[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16813732#comment-16813732
 ] 

Sebastian Nagel commented on NUTCH-2688:
----------------------------------------

 Thanks, [~roannel]! In general, yes it would be definitely a good idea to 
include such a tool into the build process. But it should be in a new issue, 
just to get this issue resolved. For now I wouldn't be so worried: once all 
license headers look the same, any new contribution will probably copy the 
header from some existing source file.

> Unify the licence headers
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-2688
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2688
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.15
>            Reporter: Roannel Fernández Hernández
>            Assignee: Roannel Fernández Hernández
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 1.16
>
>
> Sometimes the license headers are written in .java classes in a javadoc 
> comment (/** license \*/), sometimes in a block comment (/* license \*/), and 
> sometimes is a javadoc comment but with several * (/**** license */). The 
> idea is to reach an understanding on how the license headers should be 
> written on .java files.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to