Alan,
Hmm, I think it could create some confusion because all docs and even the
build system expects to find the applications directory at ../apps/
Justin, do you mind to rename it from app to apps ?
You note that the git clone with no argument will create nuttx-app/ (or
nuttx-apps/), right? So there is going to be confusion in any event.
nuttx-apps/ is a little closer to expectations, however. The directory
name can, of course, be set to anything you like in the 'git clone' command.
There would be less confusion if the repository were called apps instead
of nuttx-apps[s], but it appears the the project name on the front of
the repository is an Apache convention.
In the release tarballs, the names have been apps-x.y/ and nuttx-x.y/
where x.y is the major.minor version number. I suppose that those are
not affected (other than we will likely need to go to an x.y.z version
number where z is the revision number.
Greg
