On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 9:59 PM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Is that because there are more places that don't do it than places that > do? > Yes.. and I think just a matter of personal preference. > > Because it seems to me that the right thing to do is to leave compliant > > code alone and bring non-compliant code into compliance with the > standard, > > otherwise there is no standard. > > > > Thoughts? > > It has already been merged and a lot of water has passed under the > bridge since then. It would be tough to detangle now. > > I don't think it is am important part of the coding standard, so I don't > mind just removing these two sentences from the coding standard. > > I prefer having the (void) present because it says to me, "Don't worry, > I have thought this through and I don't need the return value." > Otherwise, I am suspicious of ignored returned values. > > But that is a pretty minor part of the coding standard. Ok. I'm okay with that. Nathan
