Yes, renaming the mkconfig*.exe* to mkconfig did the trick.
I had the same problem with mkversion*.exe* - renamed it to mkversion and
the build worked fine.

If I get some time tomorrow, I will try to find the commit that messed up
the extension.
Thanks!

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:50 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <
abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It looks like the extension got messed up.  If that's the case
> renaming mkconfig.exe to mkconfig should at least build.
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:45 PM Eduard Niesner <niesneredu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah,  there is definitely something wrong - I just tried again (ubuntu
> for
> > windows 10).
> >
> >    1. Cleaned everything (git clean and make distclean)
> >    2. checked that the *mkconfig.exe* or any other *mkconfig *binary does
> >    not exist in the tools folder
> >    3. called './tools/configure.sh -u nucleo-h743zi:nsh'
> >    4. called 'make'
> >    5. mkconfig*.exe *showed up in the tools folder.
> >
> > I even tried to make fresh clones of nuttx and apps and run the above
> steps
> > again.
> > I am not sure what else I could try..
> >
> > Edi
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:29 AM Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > I used 'make V=1' and I saw that mkconfig is being built
> successfully.
> > > >
> > > >> root@edi-laptop:/mnt/d/Work/Development/Git/GitHub/nuttx# make V=1
> > > >> make -C tools -f Makefile.host mkconfig.exe
> > > >> make[1]: Entering directory
> > > >> '/mnt/d/Work/Development/Git/GitHub/nuttx/tools'
> > >
> > > No, the binary tools/mkconfig is NOT being built.  Instead,
> > > tools/mkconfig.exe is being built.  That will not work on Ubuntu for
> > > windows.  There is something screwed up in your configuration.
> > > Specifically EXEEXT must be .exe???  But that should not happen unless
> > > you are actually trying to build for Windows Cygwin or MSYS.
> > >
> > > > I also checked the tools directory and there is a mkconfig.exe that
> was
> > > > created about the same time when I called make v=1.
> > > Again that is wrong.  It is expecting tools/mkconfig, and NOT
> > > tools/mkconfig.exe
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to