Hi, 
that's great.

I don't mind adapting it for NuttX. I think it could be made to have a hardware 
dependant lower-half to abstract
the calls to GPIO handling. 

The part I'm unsure about is the licensing. If it is based on some code you 
cannot identify I think it would not
be possible to include it unless we know the original license is compatible. Do 
you think you can identify 
where it came from? (maybe by googling a piece of code or comment)

Best,
Matias

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 15:12, Fotis Panagiotopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I do have one.
> It was designed to run on STM32F103s where the I2C peripheral has some
> errata limitations.
> I have used it extensively on many projects without any issues.
> Although I used it only for "simple" transfers of just a few bytes, I don't
> see any reason it wouldn't work in any other scenario. Apart from the low
> performance, of course.
> 
> It is properly documented, and generally uses my own HAL. So hardware calls
> are abstracted and self-explanatory.
> 
> Two issues:
> 1. It needs some work to get into NuttX. It has a very different structure,
> it's not just styling that needs to be changed.
> I believe however that it is a good basis. I am also willing to help with
> testing this on my targets.
> 
> 2. License. I am only using it on some of my small personal projects, so I
> just didn't pay much attention to licencing.
> It loosely originates from an open source library. I think it was the
> arduino-compatible library of Maple (https://www.leaflabs.com/maple), but I
> am not sure.
> Surely I have re-written most of it, to the point that I don't know whether
> there is actually any original code in there, but again it may need to be
> checked.
> In any case, it may serve as a basis for freshly written NuttX code.
> 
> If this is of any interest to you, please tell me and I can provide the
> code.
> 
> 
> Στις Δευ, 18 Ιαν 2021 στις 7:29 μ.μ., ο/η Matias N. <mat...@imap.cc> έγραψε:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > by any chance does anyone have a software I2C implementation laying around
> > (but tested) that could be submitted to NuttX? If the basis is there I can
> > do any required adaptation.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matias
> 

Reply via email to