Hello all,
Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 RC1 has been staged under [1] and it's
time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek
final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.

A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are
required to pass.

The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3]
"Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases."

A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
our project wiki and can be found here [4].

[ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
items in [4])
[ ] -1 reject (explanation required)

Thank you all,
Alin Jerpelea

SCM Information:
  Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b
  Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd

[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/
[2]https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes
[3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
[4]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release


On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 2:54 PM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I created the PR for this fix and I will create RC again if there are no
> other concerns
>
> Thanks
> Alin
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021, 14:13 Alan Carvalho de Assis <acas...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, this fix is important for all RISC-V MCUs
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> On Saturday, May 1, 2021, Gustavo Henrique Nihei <ghni...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I believe we still need to backport this PR
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3636 (already labelled)
>> > It is a complement to
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3614, which has been
>> > recently backported.
>> > Both address the issue of stack alignment for RISC-V chips.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Gustavo.
>> >
>> > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 3:50 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello all,
>> > > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 RC1 has been staged under [1] and
>> it's
>> > > time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek
>> > > final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
>> > >
>> > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
>> are
>> > > required to pass.
>> > >
>> > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3]
>> > > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
>> > > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
>> > > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
>> > > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>> > >
>> > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
>> > > our project wiki and can be found here [4].
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
>> > > items in [4])
>> > > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
>> > >
>> > > Thank you all,
>> > > Alin Jerpelea
>> > >
>> > > SCM Information:
>> > >   Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
>> > >   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
>> > > 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
>> > >   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
>> > > 112d709609e4916b21e435152679cd0b5f3177fb
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/
>> > > [2]https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/
>> > incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes
>> > > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> > > [4]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/
>> > Validating+a+staged+Release
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Gustavo Henrique Nihei
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to