As Nathan Hartman is an ASF member now, you could ask to join the IPMC, then we could have 2 binding votes when releasing...
And let me contact our champion, he has been really busy recently... Thanks. Byron Ellacott <b...@the-wanderers.org> 于2021年5月8日周六 下午1:28写道： > +1 with caveat that I need to backport the compiler patch. > > Toolchain: > clang version 13.0.0 (g...@github.com:jacobly0/llvm-project.git > ff3f5b865edbac826fdd251f810da833dda775de) > Target: ez80-none-unknown-elf > Thread model: posix > > - LICENSE, NOTICE, README.md, DISCLAIMER-WIP present in both repositories. > - Build for eZ80 using commit ID 9d4742af00 backported from master, plus > patch for Z80 ELF support (PR to happen when tested adequately) > - Build size is 253,610 text (down from 257,713 bytes for RC0), 197 bytes > in data (unchanged from RC0) > > NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-10.1.0 > nsh> free > total used free largest > Umem: 253856 66272 187584 184736 > > -- > bje > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 1:25 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis <acas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, please submit some information when you test it: > > > > - Used toolchain: i.e. last line of "gcc -v" is enough > > - ELF nuttx size: i.e. "arm-none-eabi-size nuttx" > > - Result of internal nsh free command. > > > > It will help us to track the size increase from a release to another. > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > On 5/3/21, alin.jerpe...@sony.com <alin.jerpe...@sony.com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > This is the latest tarball > > > > > > I am sorry for the confusion > > > > > > Thanks > > > Alin > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> > > > Sent: den 3 maj 2021 17:14 > > > To: dev@nuttx.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release > > > > > > On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 1:22 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello all, > > >> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 RC1 has been staged under [1] and > > >> it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will > > >> seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for > 72hr. > > >> > > >> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 > > >> are required to pass. > > >> > > >> The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] > > >> "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > > >> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > > >> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > > >> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > >> > > >> A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > > >> our project wiki and can be found here [4]. > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > > >> items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > >> > > >> Thank you all, > > >> Alin Jerpelea > > >> > > >> SCM Information: > > >> Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1 > > >> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag: > > >> 3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b > > >> Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag: > > >> 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/inc > > >> ubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4 > > >> HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBF0cM9oFQ$ > > >> [2] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apach > > >> e/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u > > >> 7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBELDkRTXA$ > > >> [3] > > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html*ap > > >> proving-a-release__;Iw!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2 > > >> TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBGKE_xsSw$ > > >> [4] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis > > >> play/NUTTX/Validating*a*staged*Release__;Kysr!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5 > > >> TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBE_QwknXQ$ > > > > > > > > > Just to be sure I don't misunderstand, this is the latest release > > candidate > > > to be tested now? > > > > > > In the future, I recommend to increment the -RC numbers each time there > > are > > > new tarballs, to avoid any potential confusion. > > > > > > If this is indeed the latest RC, I'll try to test it today. > > > > > > Thanks for all your hard work!! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Nathan > > > > > >
