Summary:
+1 to release

Verified:
* Signatures
* SHA-512 sums
* Incubating in artifact names
* LICENSE, NOTICE, README.md, DISCLAIMER-WIP present in both tarballs
* Build and run b-g474e-dpow1:nsh configuration successfully
* ReleaseNotes LGTM

Notes and observations:
* apps/wireless/wapi contains a separate LICENSE file. I think this
  should be moved into apps/LICENSE. I'll send a PR for review...

Dependencies:
* gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2017-q4-major: gcc version 7.2.1 20170904
  (release) [ARM/embedded-7-branch revision 255204] (GNU Tools for Arm
  Embedded Processors 7-2017-q4-major)
* kconfig-conf from NuttX tools repository

Other dependencies from Debian packages:
* binutils-dev: 2.31.1-16
* bison: 2:3.3.2.dfsg-1
* flex: 2.6.4-6.2
* gperf: 3.1-1
* libelf-dev: 0.176-1.1
* libgmp-dev: 2:6.1.2+dfsg-4
* libisl-dev: 0.20-2
* libmpc-dev: 1.1.0-1
* libmpfr-dev: 4.0.2-1
* libncurses5-dev: 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u2
* libusb-1.0-0-dev: 2:1.0.22-2
* libusb-dev: 2:0.1.12-32
* openocd: 0.10.0-5
* texinfo: 6.5.0.dfsg.1-4+b1

Per Alan's request for size information:

* NuttX-10.1.0-rc1, b-g474e-dpow1:nsh configuration:

$ ls -l nuttx.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 test test 113912 Apr 19 12:40 nuttx.bin

$ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
 113303     608    2612  116523   1c72b nuttx

* For comparison, same configuration on NuttX-10.0.0:

$ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
 116315     620    3008  119943   1d487 nuttx

* Sizes have improved! From NuttX-10.0.0 to NuttX-10.1.0-rc0:
- text decreases by 3012 from 116315 to 113303
- data decreases by 12 from 620 to 608
- bss decreases by 396 from 3008 to 2612
- total decreases by 3420 from 119943 to 116523

Development system: Linux (Debian 4.19.181-1 x86_64)

Thanks to everyone for making this release (candidate) possible!

Cheers,
Nathan

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:40 AM <alin.jerpe...@sony.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> 72h have passed
> Can we get some votes to finish the 10.1 release?
>
> Thanks
> Alin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alin.jerpe...@sony.com <alin.jerpe...@sony.com>
> Sent: den 3 maj 2021 17:17
> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
>
> Hello all,
>
> This is the latest tarball
>
> I am sorry for the confusion
>
> Thanks
> Alin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com>
> Sent: den 3 maj 2021 17:14
> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC1 release
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 1:22 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> > Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 RC1 has been staged under [1] and
> > it's time to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will
> > seek final release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
> >
> > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1
> > are required to pass.
> >
> > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3]
> > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed
> > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
> > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
> > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> >
> > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on
> > our project wiki and can be found here [4].
> >
> > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM
> > items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
> >
> > Thank you all,
> > Alin Jerpelea
> >
> > SCM Information:
> >   Release tag: nuttx-10.1.0-RC1
> >   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx tag:
> > 3130ff691e386934eb276587a24d1efacf3bb30b
> >   Hash for the release incubating-nuttx-apps tag:
> > 4348d91d1356335483089c3865282d80f13bedcd
> >
> > [1]
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/inc
> > ubator/nuttx/10.1.0-RC1/__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4
> > HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBF0cM9oFQ$
> > [2]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apach
> > e/incubator-nuttx/nuttx-10.1.0-RC1/ReleaseNotes__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u
> > 7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBELDkRTXA$
> > [3]
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html*ap
> > proving-a-release__;Iw!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2
> > TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBGKE_xsSw$
> > [4]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis
> > play/NUTTX/Validating*a*staged*Release__;Kysr!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!u7bO_5
> > TgIUsO429c5U2xXTz4HI0T2TqnSm836Wse15R0SGxhUdWk3viAcBE_QwknXQ$
>
>
> Just to be sure I don't misunderstand, this is the latest release candidate 
> to be tested now?
>
> In the future, I recommend to increment the -RC numbers each time there are 
> new tarballs, to avoid any potential confusion.
>
> If this is indeed the latest RC, I'll try to test it today.
>
> Thanks for all your hard work!!
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan

Reply via email to