Hi Zou, You don't feel sorry, all suggestions are welcome.
Since you aren't aware of that previous discussion it was a honest mistake! Initally NuttX didn't have an apps/ directory, it became part of NuttX when the support to build-in applications was included and in fact the initial apps/ repository was integrated inside the same repository (in Subversion) but as Mr. Greg explained apps/ is not necessary to have NuttX kernel, you can create you own application and just pass its entry point to be used by the kernel to start up. BR, Alan On 11/19/22, fft <f...@feedforward.com.cn> wrote: > sorry for my tentative idea! > > > BR, > > > > ---Original--- > From: "Gregory Nutt"<spudan...@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, Nov 19, 2022 08:26 AM > To: "dev"<dev@nuttx.apache.org>; > Subject: Re: New names of repositories > > > > Isn't it possible to merge the nuttx and apps into only one > repository？e.g: > > <nuttx&gt;/ > > |-rtos > > |-apps > > We discussed this option a couple of years ago and decided against it. > I > was VERY strongly opposed to the idea then and I still am. > > - apps is NOT part of NuttX. It is an achitecturally unrelated, mish > mash > or useful applications for NuttX, but it is not NuttX. > - I consists of mostly 3rd party code and should not contaminate the clean > modularity of the OS. > > If we want to consider this kind of code change than I would insist on a > vote and I most certainly would vote -1. I don't care about care > about > hyphens or other cosmetics but I would not support any such corruption of > the modularity of the RTOS. > > This must never happen.
