wow, it is really well supported!
OK I will start looking at a PTP server implementation and work on client later…

> On Jan 27, 2023, at 11:36 AM, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, I will try it this weekend on one of my boards….
> 
>> On Jan 27, 2023, at 11:12 AM, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, it is supported: serial and network (ethernet and WiFi).
>> 
>>>> On 1/27/23, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Outstanding!
>>> 
>>> Serial and Network…
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 27, 2023, at 10:01 AM, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi James,
>>>> 
>>>> ESP32 is supported, which features do you need?
>>>> 
>>>> BR,
>>>> 
>>>> Alan
>>>> 
>>>>> On 1/27/23, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I haven’t looked at it yet, but I am working on ESP32; is WROOM
>>>>> supported
>>>>> in master or just the S3/C3?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 4:23 AM Robert Alexa <robertalexa2...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What's the current status of this? I'm also interested in adding PTP
>>>>>> support to NuttX, especially on ESP32 if that's possible - I haven't
>>>>>> done
>>>>>> any research yet regarding the hardware capabilities of ESP32 in this
>>>>>> matter.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As a first step I was thinking of adding support for the PTP daemon, as
>>>>>> Alan suggested.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 07:39, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks Arie,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, very true, it depends on your application!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My statement about what makes a good clock is very subjective. This
>>>>>>> all depends on your application, your measurement and of course your
>>>>>>> jitter.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - For Wireless AV, a 10ms gps clock is fine.
>>>>>>> - For Wireless Earbuds, a 10us clock is required with 1us phase max
>>>>>> drift.
>>>>>>> - For Photon measurements, you're in the nano/pico domain...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Accuracy costs money, how well do you need to measure?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So the message is to know your application! Your application will have
>>>>>>> varying time requirements. The infrastructure and machinery for
>>>>>>> relaying and exchanging time is all PTP provides as a tool.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The 802.1AS spec specifies how to manage that clock across multiple
>>>>>>> time domains.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Related, know your latencies!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/jboner/2841832
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>> -James
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:37 AM Arie de Muijnck <nu...@ademu.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Beware of that 1PPS signal. A few years ago I bought several GPS
>>>>>> modules
>>>>>>>> and compared the signals. Some differ by exactly 100ns (within 2ns,
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> accuracy of my scope) from others, and that is not the width of the
>>>>>>> pulse,
>>>>>>>> that is much wider, I compared only the edge that are comes close to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> others. Maybe I will test again, have a 1 GHz LeCroy now, should be
>>>>>> able
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> do jitter measurements too.
>>>>>>>> Oh, and yes, before someone asks: all antenna and scope cables were
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> same length...  ;-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Arie
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-08 06:33, James Dougherty wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Related to this, I have a GPS receiver generating PPS interrupts on
>>>>>>>> SAME70. It would be a perfect GMC - Atomic clock sync!
>>>>>>>>> I will look at this when I get a chance. I have a lot of upstream
>>>>>>>> contributions from HW platforms I have done over the last 5 years or
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> with myself and others ... I need some time to
>>>>>>>>> patch master on upstream -- something for 2023 and now that NuttX
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>> graduated! Yay!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to