Hi James,

Yes, Espressif is doing a good work adding support to it.

I hope in the future others silicon vendors start to contribute as
well (hello ST, Microchip, Renesas, ...)

Very nice James, I think PTP will be very useful.

Please let me know if you want some help with tests, etc.

BR,

Alan

On 1/30/23, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> wow, it is really well supported!
> OK I will start looking at a PTP server implementation and work on client
> later…
>
>> On Jan 27, 2023, at 11:36 AM, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I will try it this weekend on one of my boards….
>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2023, at 11:12 AM, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, it is supported: serial and network (ethernet and WiFi).
>>>
>>>>> On 1/27/23, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Outstanding!
>>>>
>>>> Serial and Network…
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 27, 2023, at 10:01 AM, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi James,
>>>>>
>>>>> ESP32 is supported, which features do you need?
>>>>>
>>>>> BR,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/27/23, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I haven’t looked at it yet, but I am working on ESP32; is WROOM
>>>>>> supported
>>>>>> in master or just the S3/C3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 4:23 AM Robert Alexa
>>>>>> <robertalexa2...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the current status of this? I'm also interested in adding PTP
>>>>>>> support to NuttX, especially on ESP32 if that's possible - I haven't
>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>> any research yet regarding the hardware capabilities of ESP32 in
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As a first step I was thinking of adding support for the PTP daemon,
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> Alan suggested.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 07:39, James Dougherty <jafr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Arie,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, very true, it depends on your application!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My statement about what makes a good clock is very subjective. This
>>>>>>>> all depends on your application, your measurement and of course
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> jitter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - For Wireless AV, a 10ms gps clock is fine.
>>>>>>>> - For Wireless Earbuds, a 10us clock is required with 1us phase max
>>>>>>> drift.
>>>>>>>> - For Photon measurements, you're in the nano/pico domain...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Accuracy costs money, how well do you need to measure?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So the message is to know your application! Your application will
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> varying time requirements. The infrastructure and machinery for
>>>>>>>> relaying and exchanging time is all PTP provides as a tool.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The 802.1AS spec specifies how to manage that clock across multiple
>>>>>>>> time domains.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Related, know your latencies!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/jboner/2841832
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>> -James
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:37 AM Arie de Muijnck <nu...@ademu.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Beware of that 1PPS signal. A few years ago I bought several GPS
>>>>>>> modules
>>>>>>>>> and compared the signals. Some differ by exactly 100ns (within
>>>>>>>>> 2ns,
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> accuracy of my scope) from others, and that is not the width of
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> pulse,
>>>>>>>>> that is much wider, I compared only the edge that are comes close
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> others. Maybe I will test again, have a 1 GHz LeCroy now, should
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> do jitter measurements too.
>>>>>>>>> Oh, and yes, before someone asks: all antenna and scope cables
>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> same length...  ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Arie
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2022-12-08 06:33, James Dougherty wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Related to this, I have a GPS receiver generating PPS interrupts
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> SAME70. It would be a perfect GMC - Atomic clock sync!
>>>>>>>>>> I will look at this when I get a chance. I have a lot of upstream
>>>>>>>>> contributions from HW platforms I have done over the last 5 years
>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>> with myself and others ... I need some time to
>>>>>>>>>> patch master on upstream -- something for 2023 and now that NuttX
>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> graduated! Yay!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to