Hi Xiang,

Simply add some reviewers on the right side and they will be notified that 
someone asks them to step up

Best regards
Alin


-----Original Message-----
From: Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> 
Sent: den 9 mars 2023 10:12
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: DISCUSSION - Usage of mailing lists for apache projects

If some PR waits for a long time without any review, how to make progress?
For example, this PR sent two weaks ago:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/8610 

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 4:40 PM alin.jerpe...@sony.com < alin.jerpe...@sony.com> 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I  feel that this thread is getting too long without a real outcome
>
> Some observations from my daily interactions with the project:
> - I like doing reviews on github and I think that many people in this 
> thread would agree that this flow is good.
> - I like to be able to see all bugs in one place and get statistics  
> for the ASF reports
>
> What I don’t feel right
> - even if I spend time daily on reviewing patches there are still 
> changes that I miss and it is hard to get the flow on release date
> - some breaking changes are not discussed enough with the community 
> since there are some people that do not have time to review code on gihub.
>
> As a way going forward I propose that we improve in 2 aspects
> - All breaking commits should be discusses on dev so that people get 
> enough time to digest the change and even better get involved int the 
> flow
> - all breaking changes should be documented on the release confluence 
> page before merging so that we don’t miss mentioning them on release date.
> - there should be at least 1 independent reviewer (not from the same
> company) so that a patch is merged except board changes (ex an 
> employee from the same company merges a patch submitted by another 
> employee from the same company, for a board provided by the same 
> company)
>
> Thanks
> Alin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com>
> Sent: den 8 mars 2023 19:15
> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> Cc: Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr>
> Subject: Re: DISCUSSION - Usage of mailing lists for apache projects
>
> Hi Lwazi,
>
> It is not sarcarm, I'm talking about facts.
>
> Also I didn't say Sebastien points aren't valid, but is diverting from 
> the real issue.
>
> The issue is not if the discussion is happening here or there, the 
> Problem is that we don't have enough reviewers.
>
> So, first step is that NuttX needs to increase the user base, but have 
> few users really engaged with the project, reviewing patches every single day.
> Currently today he have few: Petro and Xiang are exceptional on this point.
> They are my inspiration to try do more!
>
> Welcome back go NuttX Lwazi (I'm not been sarcastic, I'm happy to hear 
> from you again! You have a great knowledge of BLE can we need! I was 
> expecting you to share that working example of BLE application using 
> our BLE stack).
>
> BR,
>
> Alan
>
> On 3/8/23, Lwazi Dube <lwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 09:55, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sebastien,
> >>
> >> If all the discussions that happens on github start to happen here, 
> >> this mailing list will be just like the nuttx-commits mailing list.
> >
> > I'll take this as sarcasm. Sebastien is making a lot of valid 
> > points, in good faith, and being dismissive does not help the community.
> >
>

Reply via email to