Generally I like to lean towards low flash footprint. However I accept the arguments in favor of POSIX compliance. How to find a balance? I think Xiang Xiao's idea makes sense: always enable the parts that have a minimal impact on flash footprint, while leaving the heavier parts conditional on a Kconfig. So we get the best of both worlds.
So yes, we will still have Kconfig and low footprint:-) Cheers Nathan On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 12:38 PM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > +1 :-) > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023, 12:54 Alin Jerpelea: > > > Hi, > > > > In my opinion we should keep the memory usage as low as possible > > +1 for menu config > > > > Best Regards > > Alin > > > > >
