On 2024-07-09 17:20:26, Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
> On 09/07/2024 17:06, michal.lyszc...@bofc.pl wrote:
> > I think I would be good if nuttx had something like /sbin/init that would
> > do some very simple service management. Then you could just tick
> > "Start NSH after boot up".
> 
> I think you can already do this by writing an init app and using that to
> spawn a shell.
> 
> Which is wasteful on small systems since you can start the shell directly
> and save memory.
> 
> Also, nsh can execute startup scripts, which are more flexible than your
> suggestion.
> 
> A few months ago, these scripts were linked to a rigid romfs automount
> system which made the whole thing very cumbersome.
> 
> But it's more flexible now, it was improved and the romfs can be customized.
> 
> Sebastien
Yes, I agree that nsh is more flexible. But the problem is that to run these
scripts you need nsh. And whole discussion is to make nsh more optional. I
suppose it could be enough to move init stuff from nsh to separate program.

-- 
.-----------------.-------------------.----------------------.-----------------.
| Michal Lyszczek | Embedded C, Linux |   Company Address    |  .-. opensource |
| +48 727 564 419 | Software Engineer | Akacjowa 10a; 55-330 |  oo|  supporter |
| https://bofc.pl `----.--------------: Brzezinka Sredzka PL | /`'\      &     |
| GPG FF1EBFE7E3A974B1 | Bits of Code | NIP:   813 349 58 78 |(\_;/) programer |
`----------------------^--------------^----------------------^-----------------'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to