TLDR: We are just testing this new tool called "GitHub Projects" to see how it works and if it fits out "roadmap" needs, no change in project organization is made, no change in repos is made, nomenclature is confusing, we can (and probably will) safely delete this testing playground, we can always try out different "roadmap" tool.
Okay, to avoid more confusion, I have deleted tables doc/www and apps, just RTOS playground is left that keeps links to selected issues and prs from all our 3 repos, with clear remark: !!! Not official yet, just a test playground to see how "GitHub Projects" application works !!! This also confirms no harm is done to any of our ->repos<- (until recently called "projects") and/or its contents when we remove this kind of "tables" (now called "projects") :-) And this confirms the "GitHub Projects" name is really unfortunate and confusing because if I wrote "guys I removed our apps project" everyone (including me) would read it "guys i removed our apps repo" and panic :D Maybe a "GitHub Roadmap" would be less confusing. Modern world problems ;-) We just have something right next to our github repos and re-use stuff already from repos. I thought it may be convenient but its confusing. Maybe Jira would be a better choice. Up to you folks! We wouldn't know if we didn't try right? :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
