Hi!

I wonder if that be really bad if we added miminal citest / selftes to
> default configurations? Or this should stay minimal?


I think one `citest` defconfig is totally different from the minimal
configs. A minimal config is intended to be used by a user experimenting
with NuttX and `citest` is meant to act as the reference configuration for
testing that board.

So we need to have an option where images are built on our IC and
> downloaded to some low-power board (e.g. Raspberry Pi) to test the user's
> boards and send the results to our IC.


It depends on the design: I agree that the firmware should be built in a
different "stage" and, depending on the build stage results, we can create
a QEMU test (if not for every board, at least to test the architecture).
Then, if successful, we can continue to the distributed hardware testing. I
think that the first (build) and second (QEMU) stages can be made upstream.
The last stage (HW test) is distributed. As we have successfully run two
stages upstream, it would be safer to have it tested on our machines.

Em qui., 6 de fev. de 2025 às 15:30, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> I think we can ask people to suggest some names and we can select the best
> name.
>
> Something to keep in mind about this distributed (build) system:
>
> Not everyone has free electricity (solar panels) to run a computer server
> 24/7. And a solution where the server owner only runs it occasionally won't
> help.
>
> So we need to have an option where images are built on our IC and
> downloaded to some low-power board (e.g. Raspberry Pi) to test the user's
> boards and send the results to our IC.
>
> This way it will be more flexible and more people could contribute.
>
> BR,
>
> Alan
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
>
> > Folks, Alan noticed there is already project named drunx :-(
> >
> > https://github.com/alxolr/drunx
> >
> > ..and the name is not really serious :D For me its just a working
> > slur, so if you have a better idea for name please share :-)
> >
> > --
> > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> >
>

Reply via email to