I've got: - Raspberry Pi Pico - Raspberry Pi Pico W - XIAO RP2040 - XIAO SAMD21 - Raspberry Pi 4B
And would also be willing to help test, provided it's easy enough for me to automate. On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:33 PM Tiago Medicci Serrano < tiago.medi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder if that be really bad if we added miminal citest / selftes to > > default configurations? Or this should stay minimal? > > > I think one `citest` defconfig is totally different from the minimal > configs. A minimal config is intended to be used by a user experimenting > with NuttX and `citest` is meant to act as the reference configuration for > testing that board. > > So we need to have an option where images are built on our IC and > > downloaded to some low-power board (e.g. Raspberry Pi) to test the user's > > boards and send the results to our IC. > > > It depends on the design: I agree that the firmware should be built in a > different "stage" and, depending on the build stage results, we can create > a QEMU test (if not for every board, at least to test the architecture). > Then, if successful, we can continue to the distributed hardware testing. I > think that the first (build) and second (QEMU) stages can be made upstream. > The last stage (HW test) is distributed. As we have successfully run two > stages upstream, it would be safer to have it tested on our machines. > > Em qui., 6 de fev. de 2025 às 15:30, Alan C. Assis <acas...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > > > I think we can ask people to suggest some names and we can select the > best > > name. > > > > Something to keep in mind about this distributed (build) system: > > > > Not everyone has free electricity (solar panels) to run a computer server > > 24/7. And a solution where the server owner only runs it occasionally > won't > > help. > > > > So we need to have an option where images are built on our IC and > > downloaded to some low-power board (e.g. Raspberry Pi) to test the user's > > boards and send the results to our IC. > > > > This way it will be more flexible and more people could contribute. > > > > BR, > > > > Alan > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > > > > > Folks, Alan noticed there is already project named drunx :-( > > > > > > https://github.com/alxolr/drunx > > > > > > ..and the name is not really serious :D For me its just a working > > > slur, so if you have a better idea for name please share :-) > > > > > > -- > > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > > > > >
