Hello,
Same, negative vote *in this state*.
The idea of LTS releases is extremely useful and important but I believe
it needs a little more organization and time.
Let's first implement everything that is being decided in the other vote
first.
Depolyable Automated Hardware testing is also very important to automate
some validation of the code. That will free up time to think about the
LTS process.
Sebastien
On 26/02/2025 14:35, Alan C. Assis wrote:
I like the LTS idea, but I need to vote -1 too!
- We don't have enough staff to even review PRs, let alone create a new
burden to LTS support.
- The current LTS approach is forcing contributors to divide PRs in many
commits, although other projects with LTS are not requiring it.
- First we need to increase our contributors base before creating LTS or
new rules that impact the few reviewers.
BR,
Alan
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:08 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
This vote proposes to start the LTS releases for NuttX RTOS
The proposed LTS release plan is
- 1st release each year is a LTS release (maintained for 1.5 years)
- 6 minor releases for each release
ex: 13.0.0-13.0.6 for our first LTS release
Voting will be open for 72hr.
A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 binding than -1 are required to
pass.
Best regards
Alin
