Hi all,

I was going to reply (or maybe I did reply in another thread?) but I don't
see it here now. Anyway I'm with you. Even though I would like to see LTS
releases (eventually), I agree that we need to get more organized first.
Improving our automated testing (on real hardware!) should definitely take
priority for now.

Cheers
Nathan

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 4:35 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I will close the vote early since there is a strong desire not to start the
> LTS releases and I will restart the topic in the future
>
> Bets regards
> Alin
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:45 PM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:08 AM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > This vote proposes to start the LTS releases for NuttX RTOS
> > > The proposed LTS release plan is
> > > - 1st release each year is a LTS release (maintained for 1.5 years)
> > > - 6 minor releases for each release
> > > ex: 13.0.0-13.0.6 for our first LTS release
> > > Voting will be open for 72hr.
> > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more +1 binding than -1 are
> required
> > to
> > > pass.
> >
> > Hey there Alin, 0 from me, sorry, as discussed before, this may create
> > additional burden of tasks and work, which in current situation may
> > not be the best choice, and I still think we should work out proper
> > self-compatibility and long term maintenance features in the first
> > place so the LTS may not be really required :-)
> >
> > I understand that LTS idea came recently in response to various
> > breakages.. that may be a good solution if anything like this happen
> > again soon, considering you will handle the burden of maintenance and
> > releases, which is quite painful even to think, I know.
> >
> > I would not yet plan the release 13. Let's stick to 12 for now and
> > just plan breaking changes slowly for 13. When things are ready then
> > we may start LTS from 13?
> >
> > Thanks!! :-)
> > Tomek
> >
> > --
> > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> >
>

Reply via email to