Hi KR, What avr-gcc version are you using?
I'm getting this error: "avr-gcc: error: device-specs/specs-avr128da28: No such file or directory" I found a reference to it here: https://www.avrfreaks.net/s/topic/a5C3l000000UlWyEAK/t193338 I downloaded the Microchip.AVR-Dx_DFP.2.7.321.atpack file renamed it to Microchip.AVR-Dx_DFP.2.7.321.zip and extract it, but I think it is something ot xc8 from Microchip... Are you using Linux as well? I'm using Ubuntu and just ran: "sudo apt install avr-gcc". Could you please BR, Alan On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 7:49 AM <kr....@kerogit.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the response and for the PR on GitHub. > > > Ok. If possible, could you explain the issue with github? > > Well, it's a personal thing. Aside from the usual gripe about big > corporation there is also a clause in their Terms of Service that > requires the user to "agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and > venue of the courts located in the City and County of San Francisco, > California." And that's certainly something I don't agree with. > > > I think in this case we could add _bm and _bp as exceptions as well. > > The _bm case is the most prevalent in the current source so that's a > great help. There are currently two cases of _gp and around 10 cases of > _gc so that should be manageable to redefine in the architecture code. > It also seems like I missed a 5th suffix - _gm - but that also has > around 10 uses currently. > > Even with the bm exception though, the nxstyle tools reports mixed case > errors. Apparently, it cannot apply the exception for the line of code > which looks like this: > > ret = (VPORTA.IN & (PIN2_bm | PIN3_bm)) >> 2; > > Splitting it into two lines works though and it should yield the same > result in the machine code. > > ret = (VPORTA.IN & (PIN2_bm | PIN3_bm)); > ret >>= 2; > > I'll incorporate these changes to the next revision of the patch series > and also submit a patch for the nxstyle.c > > > > >> 2. These patches depend on "nuttx/clock: make NSEC_PER_USEC and others > >> long" (ac42add946) being applied. It is only present in NuttX master > >> branch and needs to be cherry-picked for testing on the branch based > >> on > >> release 12.9 > >> > >> > > Could you please give more details here? > > Since the fixes were applied to the master branch, I expect the > remaining patches in the series to go there as well - in which case > everything is sorted and nothing else needs to be done, the patch > ac42add946 is present there. The issue why that patch is needed is > explained in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/xzor3tjy9jozlmox82frd27v969b37l4 . In > short - without this patch, avr-gcc will produce malfunctioning code > when converting between ticks and time. > > Hope I didn't miss any questions, please point it out if I did. Other > than that, I will try to submit second version of the patch series > during the next week. > > Thanks for the review. >
