Okay so looks like there are two name propositions for this new application: 1. Android System Init -> apps/android/init -> android_init (or just ainit). 2. NXInit -> apps/system/nxinit -> nxinit.
If the discussion with ideas is concluded lets just VOTE on the mailing list so the community decides what name is best and merge the code named as decided by the community :-) For me both approaches are okay :-) In order to stay compliant with https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting vote should be in dedicated thread marked [VOTE] prefix it should take 72h and we can receive votes for both options, +1 0 -1 replies are possible, the one that gets most count wins, -1 from PMC vetoes a choice unless vote update. Jianyu Wang could you please start the voting thread and then make summary after 72h? Thanks :-) Tomek On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:24 AM Sebastien Lorquet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I agree. nxinit or similar is fine for me. > > Sebastien > > On 10/24/25 10:08, Michal Lenc wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > >> With reference to Jehudi’s suggestion, I propose naming this new > >> component "NuttX Init" (abbreviated as "NxInit", with the path: > >> apps/system/nxinit). This naming follows the style of existing > >> components, such as nxplayer and nxcamera. > > > > jumping a bit late to the discussion, but I agree with NuttX Init or > > nxinit naming for the system. The Android Init Language adoption for > > the init system can be mentioned in the documentation, but Android in > > the name could lead to some unnecessary confusion. > > > > Best regards, > > Michal Lenc -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
