Yeah I am okay with this new updated name apps/system/nxinit in place of too generic apps/system/init :-)
It would be good to vote but as there are no other ideas / comments / objections we can proceed with the change as NXINIT. If there are this is the last chance to talk :-) Thanks :-) Tomek On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:52 AM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Tomek, > > +1 NXInit -> apps/system/nxinit -> nxinit. > > I think that we should avoid using external names (that inspired the init) to > avoid confusion and functionality demands from our init systems (compared > with the ones that inspired them). > > Best regards > Alin > > ________________________________ > Från: Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> > Skickat: den 27 oktober 2025 10:38 > Till: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Ämne: Re: 答复: [External Mail]Re: NuttX and Android System Init > > Okay so looks like there are two name propositions for this new application: > 1. Android System Init -> apps/android/init -> android_init (or just ainit). > 2. NXInit -> apps/system/nxinit -> nxinit. If the discussion with ideas is > > > Okay so looks like there are two name propositions for this new application: > 1. Android System Init -> apps/android/init -> android_init (or just ainit). > 2. NXInit -> apps/system/nxinit -> nxinit. > > If the discussion with ideas is concluded lets just VOTE on the > mailing list so the community decides what name is best and merge the > code named as decided by the community :-) For me both approaches are > okay :-) > > In order to stay compliant with > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting__;!!O7_YSHcmd9jp3hj_4dEAcyQ!0JCOIC16hQ3HxoIk9pIqT4artidleKvzBPykPap3tsQBhnbyyJXu9pAqD0266vl1Jdybh5WBFAZv5a-zoA$ > vote should be in dedicated > thread marked [VOTE] prefix it should take 72h and we can receive > votes for both options, +1 0 -1 replies are possible, the one that > gets most count wins, -1 from PMC vetoes a choice unless vote update. > > Jianyu Wang could you please start the voting thread and then make > summary after 72h? > > Thanks :-) > Tomek > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:24 AM Sebastien Lorquet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I agree. nxinit or similar is fine for me. > > > > Sebastien > > > > On 10/24/25 10:08, Michal Lenc wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > >> With reference to Jehudi’s suggestion, I propose naming this new > > >> component "NuttX Init" (abbreviated as "NxInit", with the path: > > >> apps/system/nxinit). This naming follows the style of existing > > >> components, such as nxplayer and nxcamera. > > > > > > jumping a bit late to the discussion, but I agree with NuttX Init or > > > nxinit naming for the system. The Android Init Language adoption for > > > the init system can be mentioned in the documentation, but Android in > > > the name could lead to some unnecessary confusion. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Michal Lenc > > > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.tomek.cedro.info__;!!O7_YSHcmd9jp3hj_4dEAcyQ!0JCOIC16hQ3HxoIk9pIqT4artidleKvzBPykPap3tsQBhnbyyJXu9pAqD0266vl1Jdybh5WBFAZ67IDOFA$ > -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
