This may depend on whether it's a SAMA5D2 or D3 or D4?

I only have experience of the SAMA5D2 and I think this is messed up in a more subtle way for that device. There is essentially only 1 internal SRAM available which is:

 * 256k id L2 cache is disabled or
 * 128k when L2 cache is enabled.


From the SAMA5D2 datasheet:

   /The SAMA5D2 embeds a total of 128 Kbytes of high-speed SRAM. After
   reset, and until the Remap command is/

   /performed, the SRAM is accessible at address 0x0020 0000. When the
   AXI Bus Matrix is remapped, the SRAM is/

   /also available at address 0x0./

   /
   /

   /The device features a second 128-Kbyte SRAM that can be allocated
   either to the L2 cache controller or used as/

   /an internal SRAM. After reset, this block is connected to the
   system SRAM, making the two 128-Kbyte RAMs/

   /contiguous. The SRAM_SEL bit, located in the SFR_L2CC_HRAMC
   register, is used to reassign this memory as a/

   /L2 cache memory./

Although I have boards I am currently not able to do any work, for personal reasons, so I can't check any of this for real.

On 09/04/2026 16:12, Peter Barada wrote:
I ran builds over all of arm with increased warnings (-Wall -Wextra -Wsystem-headers -Wformat -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-implicit-fallthrough) to see what warnings have been hidden turns up redefinition warnings, one of which for all builds of giant-board, jupiter-nano and sama5d2-xult boards:

include/arch/sama5/chip.h:106: warning: "SAM_ISRAM0_SIZE" redefined

Looking at include/arch/sama5/chip.h:

#  define SAM_ISRAM0_SIZE (128*1024) /* SRAM0: 128KB */
#ifdef CONFIG_ARMV7A_L2CC_PL310
#  define SAM_ISRAM1_SIZE (0)        /* (SRAM1 used for L2 cache )*/
#else
#  define SAM_ISRAM0_SIZE (64*1024)  /* SRAM1: 128KB */
#endif

I think Greg[*] meant to at line 106 to define SAM_ISRAM1_SIZE instead of SAM_ISRAM0_SIZE. Does this make sense? I don't have any of the mentioned boards to test with, but can create a PR.

[*] https://github.com/apache/nuttx/commit/831272cd35692cf3bec8a1bfd4f8fc3cc8f80dbb

Reply via email to